Dinner Table

By -
For my dinner table I seated Clarke at the head of the table because I feel as if her opinion is similar to that of Henning and Grosso.  I feel that Clarke is more broad and the other two are more specific, yet they can all talk about how vegetarianism would be beneficial for multiple reasons.  Henning and Clarke both believe that vegetarianism could help with conserving our planet.  Girgis believes that vegetarianism prevents disease.  Since Lokuruka wrote about meat quality and how this coincides with animal treatment, the two of them could discuss meat consumption/processes as they apply to health.  I don't think anyone at this dinner table would have conflict with one another because I believe they would all support vegetarianism, just for different reasons.

(Author's last names used around table)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chapter 1 Response

By -
After reading this chapter I realized that choosing a genre is an important and rather strenuous task, as one needs to execute the process to their own liking.   In my own personal experiences, I was never given the opportunity to explore the various genres offered, as I was always told to write a certain way in order to receive passable scores on either the AP and AICE examinations.   Therefore, this article on genres and the different ways to relay your central message to the audience was very intriguing to me.   Additionally, this chapter further enhanced my knowledge on the three rhetorical appeals of ethos, pathos, and logos.   My tenth grade AICE English Language class briefly explained these devices, so I was always very eager to learn more about using these appeals within my own ideas and the variations within each.   Thus, these appeals will help correlate the various forms of media layouts used to capture the readers’ or the audiences’ attentions which, in my opinion, is an
Read more

Project 2 Reflection

By -
1)      In this essay I am most proud of the new way in which I learned to write a research paper. I was able to incorporate new writing skills into my paper that I never learned in my high school classes but will aid me in my future writing. 2)      If I had more time to work on this essay I would try to include more specific details to support my topic from a wider range of sources and provide more reasoning to support the legalization of physician assisted suicide. 3)      Peer reviews benefitted my essay the most. This is because it provided me with a lot of constructive feedback that I was able to take into consideration while editing my paper. The teacher review also helped me inn a similar way because it gave me some direction with where to go with my essay. 4)      While writing this project I was able to learn a different way of writing a research paper in which I have previously done in high school. This paper was more formal than other research papers I have written.
Read more

Action Plan

By -
Based on the feedback I received from the peer review session, there are minimal aspects to my research paper that need to be changed. The most important change that needs to be completed before submitting my final draft is I need to make sure to fully develop my opinions within my conclusion. I also believe that there are a few sentences that could be enhanced within my literature review. I believe that these changes will make my essay more coherent to readers.
Read more